cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a long way they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last observed.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the legislation laid down from the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority of your parent department of the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
For a society, it is actually essential to continue striving for a just legal system that assures fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application from the death penalty or life imprisonment depends over the specifics of each and every case, which includes any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
Utilize the PACER Case Locator if You're not certain which specific federal court the case was filed. You may also conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in a federal case. This database updates at midnight every day.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty to the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
whether though granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration because of the Court under Article 184 (three), continues to be setting a precedent which allows for much less complicated access into the public to approach the superior courts as well as the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by performing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death of your such person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions within the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental legislation in Pakistan, it truly is important that the case set up the application with the precautionary principle where there can be a menace to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right to your clean and read more healthy environment.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are recognized by executive companies based on statutes.